Work Mint vs Paycom
Paycom's argument is one database for everything, with employees doing their own payroll entry. It is a coherent model and it works well for large US employers. The gap is the same as the others: it is built for one country.
Was Paycom besser macht
Von uns geschrieben, über einen Wettbewerber. Lieber hier als erst nach der Unterschrift.
- One system of record, deeply integratedEverything in a single database, which removes whole categories of reconciliation problem.
- Employee-driven payroll at scaleTheir self-service model is built for thousands of employees and works at that size.
- US compliance and filingFederal, state and local tax filing done on your behalf, with the liability that implies taken on by them. Work Mint does not file taxes for you anywhere, and would not pretend to.
Wo Work Mint besser passt
- Outside the United States at allPayroll reported in 32 currencies, with statutory rules configured per company, country by country.
- Proportionate to a growing companyYou do not need thousands of employees for it to make sense, and you can switch off the modules you do not use.
- Plain about what it does not doNo recruiting, no performance, no learning. Our security page lists what we do not hold, including the certifications we have not earned.
Wählen Sie Paycom, wenn
You are a larger US employer who wants one database and a self-service payroll model.
Wählen Sie Work Mint, wenn
You are growing, paying people in several currencies, and you want a system sized to that rather than to a US enterprise.
Wir sind ein kleines, junges Produkt und sagen das auch. Was wir nicht tun werden: eine Zertifizierung behaupten, die wir nicht haben, oder einen Kunden, den es nicht gibt. Alle Vergleiche